This article does not have an English version.

Autor: Felipe Cardemil[1,2,3]

Filiación:
[1] Departamento de Oncología Básico Clínica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
[2] Departamento de Otorrinolaringología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
[3] Departamento de Otorrinolaringología, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile

E-mail: felipecardemil@med.uchile.cl

Correspondencia a:
[1] Avenida Independencia 1027
Independencia
Santiago
Chile

Citación: Cardemil F. Comparison analysis and applications of the Bland-Altman method: correlation or agreement?. Medwave 2017 Ene-Feb;16(1):e6852 doi: 10.5867/medwave.2017.01.6852

Fecha de envío: 16/1/2016

Fecha de aceptación: 18/1/2016

Fecha de publicación: 24/1/2017

Origen: no solicitado

Ficha PubMed

Comentarios (0)

Nos complace que usted tenga interés en comentar uno de nuestros artículos. Su comentario será publicado inmediatamente. No obstante, Medwave se reserva el derecho a eliminarlo posteriormente si la dirección editorial considera que su comentario es: ofensivo en algún sentido, irrelevante, trivial, contiene errores de lenguaje, contiene arengas políticas, obedece a fines comerciales, contiene datos de alguna persona en particular, o sugiere cambios en el manejo de pacientes que no hayan sido publicados previamente en alguna revista con revisión por pares.

Aún no hay comentarios en este artículo.

---

Para comentar debe iniciar sesión

Medwave publica las vistas HTML y descargas PDF por artículo, junto con otras métricas de redes sociales.

Se puede producir un retraso de 48 horas en la actualización de las estadísticas.

1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983;(32): 307-317. | Link |
2. Hebert JR, Miller DR. The inappropriateness of conventional use of the correlation coefficient in assessing validity and reliability of dietary assessment methods. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991 Jul;7(4):339-43. | PubMed |
3. Bellach B. Remarks on the use of Pearson's correlation coefficient and other association measures in assessing validity and reliability of dietary assessment methods. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993 Oct;47 Suppl 2:S42-5. | PubMed |
4. van Stralen KJ, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. Agreement between methods. Kidney Int. 2008 Nov;74(9):1116-20. | CrossRef | PubMed |
5. Schmidt ME, Steindorf K. Statistical methods for the validation of questionnaires--discrepancy between theory and practice. Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(4):409-13. | PubMed |
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):41-2. | PubMed |
7. Harada ND, Chiu V, King AC, Stewart AL. An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun;33(6):962-70. | PubMed |
8. Hamilton C, Stamey J. Using Bland-Altman to assess agreement between two medical devices--don't forget the confidence intervals! J Clin Monit Comput. 2007 Dec;21(6):331-3. | PubMed |
9. Bunce C. Correlation, agreement, and Bland-Altman analysis: statistical analysis of method comparison studies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):4-6. | CrossRef | PubMed |
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10. | PubMed |
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60. | PubMed |
12. Euser AM, Dekker FW, le Cessie S. A practical approach to Bland-Altman plots and variation coefficients for log transformed variables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):978-82. | CrossRef | PubMed |
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1085-7. | PubMed |
14. King AJ, Taguri A, Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;240(6):481-7. | PubMed |
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;22(1):85-93. | PubMed |
16. Müller R, Büttner P. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994 Dec 15-30;13(23-24):2465-76. | PubMed |
17. Prieto L, Lamarca R, Casado A. [Assessment of the reliability of clinical findings: the intraclass correlation coefficient]. Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Feb 7;110(4):142-5. | PubMed |
18. Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966 Aug;19(1):3-11. | PubMed |

Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983;(32): 307-317. | Link |

Hebert JR, Miller DR. The inappropriateness of conventional use of the correlation coefficient in assessing validity and reliability of dietary assessment methods. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991 Jul;7(4):339-43. | PubMed |

Bellach B. Remarks on the use of Pearson's correlation coefficient and other association measures in assessing validity and reliability of dietary assessment methods. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993 Oct;47 Suppl 2:S42-5. | PubMed |

van Stralen KJ, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. Agreement between methods. Kidney Int. 2008 Nov;74(9):1116-20. | CrossRef | PubMed |

Schmidt ME, Steindorf K. Statistical methods for the validation of questionnaires--discrepancy between theory and practice. Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(4):409-13. | PubMed |

Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):41-2. | PubMed |

Harada ND, Chiu V, King AC, Stewart AL. An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun;33(6):962-70. | PubMed |

Hamilton C, Stamey J. Using Bland-Altman to assess agreement between two medical devices--don't forget the confidence intervals! J Clin Monit Comput. 2007 Dec;21(6):331-3. | PubMed |

Bunce C. Correlation, agreement, and Bland-Altman analysis: statistical analysis of method comparison studies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):4-6. | CrossRef | PubMed |

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10. | PubMed |

Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60. | PubMed |

Euser AM, Dekker FW, le Cessie S. A practical approach to Bland-Altman plots and variation coefficients for log transformed variables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):978-82. | CrossRef | PubMed |

Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1085-7. | PubMed |

King AJ, Taguri A, Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;240(6):481-7. | PubMed |

Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;22(1):85-93. | PubMed |

Müller R, Büttner P. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994 Dec 15-30;13(23-24):2465-76. | PubMed |

Prieto L, Lamarca R, Casado A. [Assessment of the reliability of clinical findings: the intraclass correlation coefficient]. Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Feb 7;110(4):142-5. | PubMed |

Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966 Aug;19(1):3-11. | PubMed |